Arbitration & ADR, Insights

Nigeria Avoids Payment of Us$11 billion Dollar Arbitral Award Debt to P&ID: Is the Legal Battle Really Over?

INTRODUCTION

In January 2010, the Nigerian Government entered into a Gas Supply and Processing Agreement (GSPA) with a company known as Process & Industrial Developments Limited (P&ID). Three years after, P&ID declared breach and commenced arbitration proceedings. In two awards issued 17th July 2015 and 31st January 2017, the arbitral tribunal – composed of Lord Hoffmann, Sir Anthony Evans and Chief Bayo Ojo, SAN – found that Nigeria had committed a repudiatory breach of the GSPA, that P&ID was entitled to the sum of US$6.6 billion as damages and 7% interest (Chief Ojo, SAN published a dissent with respect to the award of damages). Having regard to the interest awarded by the arbitral tribunal, as of 2023, Nigeria was an award-debtor in the sum of US$11 billion.

After a series of proceedings in English and Nigerian courts, Nigeria formally challenged the arbitral awards in proceedings commenced before the Commercial Court in England. In a 127-paged judgment – excluding the Annex – handed down on the 23rd day of October 2023, Hon. Mr. Justice Knowles upheld the Nigeria’s challenge to the awards. In his judgment, Knowles J found as a fact that among other elements of fraudulent conduct proved during the challenge proceeding: (a) P&ID had obtained the GSPA by bribing an official of the Nigerian government; (b) P&ID had knowingly provided false evidence to the arbitral tribunal; and (c) P&ID had corruptly obtained privileged documents pertaining to Nigeria’s conduct of the arbitral proceeding. Accordingly, Nigeria’s challenge under Section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996 (applicable in England) succeeded because the awards were obtained by fraud and were contrary to public policy.

In a further ruling handed down on 21st December 2023, Knowles J set aside the awards and denied leave to P&ID to appeal against his judgment. With these decisions, Nigeria does not have to pay “a sum so vast that it is material to Nigeria’s entire federal budget”. The judgment of the Knowles J has been rightly described as a…

To read the full article, kindly download the PDF

Harrison Ogalagu

Partner

Practice Key Contacts

More To Read

07/10/2024
Implementation Framework and Potential Implications of the Domestic Crude Supply Obligations (“DCS0”)

INTRODUCTION While reiterating commitment to the development of the domestic crude oil market driven by willing buyer-willing seller arrangements, the Petroleum Industry Act 2021 (“PIA”)

18/09/2024
The Zhongshan Fucheng Industrial Investment Co. Ltd. V. Federal Republic of Nigeria Arbitral Award – Analysis of the Issues

The arbitral award issued in favour of Zhongshan Fucheng against Nigeria by a UK-seated tribunal on 26 March 2021 elicited significant public reactions only after