Arbitration & ADR, Insights

An Examination of Triple Identity Test in Resolving Fork-In-The-Road Clause Objections

Most often, investors engage in investments activities by establishing or investing in a local company in the host State(s) to enable them participate in large scale projects and take advantage of some economic opportunities in those State(s). By virtue of these investments, there exists a business relationship between an investor and the host State, which occasionally is prone to disputes. A vast majority of bilateral investment treaties (BITs) as well as some regional agreements and other instruments, contain provisions for settlement of disputes between Investors and the host State.

A significant provision of investment treaties is the one on settlement of disputes arising from such treaties between the investor and the host State. This provision, although, may be drafted in different terms, provides for recourse to international arbitration (“arbitral tribunal”) or domestic courts of the host State in settlement of disputes, specifying that a choice made by the investor shall be exclusive and final. This is called the fork in the road (“FITR”) clause and by implication, an investor cannot institute an arbitral proceeding to address the same claim for which he had instituted a suit in the domestic court…

 

 

To read the full article, kindly download the PDF

Harrison Ogalagu

Partner

Nnamdi Ezekwem

Associate

Practice Key Contacts

More To Read

16/05/2025
The Law of Defamation in Nigeria: A Shield and A Sword

Introduction The entire gamut of the law of defamation revolves around two forms: libel (written) and slander (oral). Carefully observing how this law operates will

13/05/2025
Airlines Liability Caps: Exploring Alternative Remedies for Passengers

Introduction. Air passengers and carriers/airlines are constantly involved in the thorny affair of breached rights and obligations and the consequential liabilities that result. Issues arise